"In demographic terms, Generation Jones was part of the baby boom which ended in the early 1960s. However, the events stereotypically associated with generational discussion of Boomers, including protests over civil rights and the Vietnam war and the emergence of rock music took place while the members of Generation Jones were still children or early teenagers... Thus the early life experience of this group was more similar, in many respects, to that commonly imputed to Generation X. Generation Jones is thus associated with such pop icons such as Pong, the "Walkman", Rubics Cube and MTV." Wikipedia entry excerpt
Apparently, there are some people born in 1961 who when polled recently, proclaimed themselves to be members of Generation Jones, a name coined by social commentator, Jonathan Pontell. This generation, previously unknown to me, is the subject of a recent post by William Harryman of Integral Options Café. Described as a lost generation between Boomers and Generation X that is characterized by their shared experience of largely unfulfilled expectations, Generation Jones has been heralded by some as the real next generation of leadership in the United States.
While I’m not surprised that people considered to be on the cusp of generations might not identify as fully with one or the other, this identification of bridging Boomers and Gen X-ers as Generation Jonesers creates a quickening of sorts in the generational timeline. With the addition of Generation Jones, if I’ve understood correctly, the time-spans for the generations start to look more like ten to fifteen years per generation with Boomers identified in this version of the timeline as those born between 1943 -1953, then Generation Jones born between 1954 – 1965, Generation X born between 1966 – 1981, and Millennials born between 1981 – 2001. That said, if you go to Wikipedia and look up the different generations, you will find enough disparate time allocations to make your head spin.
As referenced in the previous post about Gen X, I tend to favor those timespans used by William Strauss and Neil Howe, which they have correlated with significant watershed moments, cultural and socioeconomic conditions that they think have shaped each generation. Yet, however one slices the generational timeline, it seems that the traditional span of twenty to thirty years per generation is no longer as common in defining new generational cohorts as is the perceived collective experience that can be translated into a somewhat coherent cultural zeitgeist. Given how rapidly our world seems to be changing in response to new technology, global climate change, and the like, this trend is not surprising, although it does make generational definitions a bit trickier, perhaps a bit more arbitrary—more like moving targets than fixed positions in a generational timeline.
I do like the trend toward self-definition as an important factor though. Asking people to choose the generation with which they identify most is just one step away from respecting individuals of different ages enough to ask them to define and characterize their own generation—giving each generation a chance to describe themselves before being labeled thus and so by people of other generations. Imagine that.
Navigating the New Age of Awakening
Excellent video by Bernhard Guenther about the importance of discernment for both self and world...
Posted at 12:25 PM in Query & Commentary | Permalink | Comments (0)
Tags: awakening, bernhard guenther, new-age, self-help, self-knowledge, self-realization
| Reblog (0)